Environmental Sampling II. 

 

| Home | Schedule | Gellért Hill | Info Park | OMSZ LRK |Talks | Reports |

 

SCHEDULE 2019

 

 

Gellért Hill

Info Park
OMSZ LRK

extra

 

Water Sampling

Soil Sampling

Air Quality

 

field work

febr. 28.

march 21.

 

 

lab measurement

march 7.

march 28.

april 4.

 

talk 

march 14.

april 11.

may 2.

may 16.

report submission

march 21.

april 18.

may 2. 

 

test

april 25.

april 25.

april 25. 

may 16.

 

water radon

EC, pH 

esmog, noise,

soil sampling , heavy metal

cromatogram

smog alert

 

 

GRADES

 

 

 

Talks

Gellért Hill

Info Park

OMSZ LRK

final

 

 

topic

date

grade

test

rep

test

rep

test

rep

grade

A

Alwani Naji (SYR)

waste

05.16.

4

3

4

2

5

2

5

4

A

Temelath Thipphasone (LAO)

SMO

05.02.

3

2

4

2

5

2

5

3

A

Németh Zoltán (HUN)

RAD

03.14.

4/5

5

4

5

5

5

5

5

A

Biró Anna (HUN)

XRF

04.11.

4

4

4

4

5

2

5

4

A

Makwisa Emanuel (TAN)

Energy

05.02.

6

5

4

5

5

2

5

5

B

Schadeck Locatelli Julia (BRA)

GCR

05.02.

5

3

5

5

5

2

4

4

B

Oliveira Amanda Lafetá (BRA)

RAD

03.14.

5

5

5

3

5

2

4

4

B

Azevedo Borges Catarina (BRA)

Soil

04.11.

5

5

5

5

5

3

4

5

B

Nobre Dias Ana Karla (BRA)

XRF

04.11.

5

5

5

4

5

4

4

5

B

Borges Silva Lara Rubia (BRA)

Energy

04.11.

5

4/5

5

5

5

3

4

5

C

Naber Rakan (JOR)

water

05.16.

5

3

4/5

4

4

4

4/5

4

C

Mbideen Musab (JOR)

SMO

05.02.

3/4

4

4/5

3

4

3

4/5

4

C

Wardeh Salma (SYR)

water

05.02.

4

3

4/5

4

4

2

4/5

4

C

Khirv Aleksandra (RUS)

RAD

03.14.

4/5

5

4/5

4

4

2

4/5

4

C

Smati Alaa Eddine (TUN)

wat cont

05.02.

5

3

4/5

2

4

2

4/5

4

C

Tursunalieva Eliza (KIR)

ESM

04.11.

4

4

4/5

4

4

5

4/5

4

D

Andrade Tobar Jean Carlo (ECU)

GCR

05.02.

5

5

4/5

4

4

5

4/5

5

D

Nava Olivas José (MEX)

RAD

03.14.

4

3

4/5

3

4

4

4/5

4

D

Ordoñez Jacome Santiago Fernando (ECU)

solar

05.02.

4

4

4/5

4

4

3

4/5

4

D

Llumiquinga Paucar Yesenia Belen (ECU)

water

05.16.

4/5

5

4/5

4

4

3

4/5

4

D

Parra Mayra Alejandra (ECU)

ZAJ

04.11.

3/4

3

4/5

2/3

4

3

4/5

4

E

Hmissi Naoures (TUN)

Soil

04.11.

5

4

5

3

5

3

5

4

E

Batdorj Narangua (MON)

energy

05.16.

4

3

5

4

5

3

5

4

E

Trinh Nam Phong (VIE)

RAD

03.14.

3/4

3

5

2

5

3

5

4

E

Maussymbay Kairatkyzy Assel (KAZ)

ESM

04.11.

4

2

5

3

5

5

5

4

E

Do Thanh Phuong (VIE)

GCR

05.02.

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

F

Medianista Roja (FIL)

RAD

03.14.

4/5

4

5

4

5

3

5

4

F

Kabasa Maureen Atieno (KEN)

SMO

05.02.

5

4

5

4

5

4

5

5

F

Bart-Plange Sarah Ewurakua (GHA)

Water

04.11.

4

2

5

3

5

4

5

4

F

Sequeira Barbosa Helen Deise (CVE)

Water

03.14.

5

5

5

4

5

3

5

5

F

Chauke Diboleleng Helga Mahlori (ZAF)

Water

03.14.

5

4

5

3

5

4

5

4

F

Khaidi Ahmad Amir Shabrin (MAL)

ZAJ

04.11.

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

 

 

 

COMMENTS

 

Lectures on March 14.

 

Németh Zoltán (RAD)

advantages: logical, good resoning, pH-relationship

drawback: visualization of data

Oliveira Amanda Lafetá (RAD)

advantages: logical, good reasoning, pH-correlation

drawback:

Khirv Aleksandra (RAD)

advantages: expained photos, logical structure of the lecture

drawbacks: too many digits

Nava Olivas José (RAD)

advantages: expained photos

drawbacks: visualization of the decay loss, no conclusions, no attempt for relationships

Trinh Nam Phong (RAD)

advantages: good speach, logical structure

drawbacks: CPM/8 min, c0/0.01, no info about the solid samples, the preparation of the vials, not any details about the mass of the solid sample

Medianista Roja (RAD)

advantages: uncertainties of pH, EC,

drawbacks: no conclusions, no attempt for relationships

 

Chauke Diboleleng Helga (water)

advantages: very good lecture, deep background information, very well prepared in the topic

drawbacks: –

Barbosa Helen Deise (water)

advantages: very good lecture, deep background information, very well prepared in the topic

drawbacks: –

 

 

Lectures on April 11.

 

Bíró Anna (XRF)

advantages: good speach, good description of the work

drawback: calibration and background measurement were not clear

Ana Karla Nobre Dias (XRF)

advantages: logical structure, weel developed description of soil layers, rfa analysis is ambitious

drawback: Ca peak analysis was missing

Elisa Tursunalieva (ESM)

advantages: good lecture, nice summary of the work

drawbacks: underground cable is not possible source

Mayra Parra (ZAJ)

advantages: Application of mobile app

drawbacks: software and the method were not described almost at all, too silent lecture (shy)

Catarina Azevedo Borges (contamination)

advantages: video presentation, collected overall background information

drawback:

Sarah Ewurakua Bart-Plange (water)

advantages: interesting topic,

drawback: missing relationships, incoherency 

Assel Maussymbay (ESM)

advantages: good description of the area

drawbacks: numbers

Amir Khaidi Ahmad (ZAJ)

advantages: definiton of noise, look up the WHO report, very good talk, logical structure, humorous, very good job

drawbacks: black background in graph, couldn’t see the lines

Lara Rubia (energy)

advantages: interesting, deep professional background, well prepared

drawback: lifetime aspects missing

Noures Hmissi (salt)

advantages: video presentation, good overview, clearity, well prepared

drawback:

 

 

 

 

 

Lectures on May 2.

 

Thipphasone Temelath (SMO)

advantages:

drawback:

Julia Locatelli (GCR)

advantages:

drawback:

Musab Mbideen (SMO)

advantages:

drawbacks:

Emanuel Makwisa (energy)

advantages:

drawbacks:

Alaa Smati (water)

advantages:

drawback:

Do Thanh Phuong (GCR btex)

advantages:

drawback:

Jean Carlo Andrade (GCR SO2)

advantages:

drawbacks:

Maureen Kabasa (SMO)

advantages:

drawbacks:

Salma Wardeh (water)

advantages:

drawback:

Santiago Ordonez (energy)

advantages:

drawback: